D4s image quality - ISO still short of the Df!

Featured Wednesday, 12 March 2014 03:15

The D4s has just been tested, with surprising results.

 When the Nikon D4 came out - it was a BIG advance over the D3s. The ISO performance was significantly better - and it instantly became the top rated 35mm DSLR sensor tested by DXOmark - until the D800 came out!

A few years later, and a few models passed, the D4s is now on the street and, as the official Nikon press release states, it has "A new 16.23 image sensor specifically matched to the new EXPEED 4 image processor delivers stunning images that exhibit even greater sharpness and enhanced depth" and they claim "...unrivalled low light performance."

We are all fairly accustomed to bold claims at release right, but how would it stack up in reality? DXOmark have tested it - and whilst I know a lot of folks question the testing methods (Nikon cameras tend to perform best), and of course technical performance is only part of overall quality of a camera - the results can still be compared side by side.

First off the bat - it exceeds the Canon flagship 1Dx in every category tested. However, it ends up with the same score as the camera it replaces - the Nikon D4. As the tables below show, whilst the D4 and D4s both scored 89, it has improved in ISO slightly(3074 vs 2965) - but it scores LOWER for colour depth.

The interesting thing is that the much maligned Nikon Df still outperforms them all in ISO performance - by 200 points - double the improvement the D4s offers over the D4.

sensors

D4s vs 1Dx

Images from DXOmark

As I said above - these ratings are only a small part of the story. I seriously doubt that a few points improvement in ISO performance is enough for anyone to upgrade, or change systems. Ergonomics, focus capabilities, battery life and rugged build time are (to me) far more important aspects when considering a sports camera like the D4s & 1Dx. What do you think? Share your thoughts on the Community Forum thread HERE.

That said, for those who DON'T need ultimate speed and the other benefits a big $6,000 camera offer, but who DO want amazing ISO performance... the Df may just be the way to go. I will be doing a follow up review on that, after several months of ownership, very soon.

DigitalRev discount - Limited Offer!

Share:

Leave a comment

Tamron & Sigma 150-600mm vs Nikon 200-500mm

Tamron & Sigma 150-600mm vs Nikon 200-500mm

Wednesday, 24 April 2019 01:35

Thanks to the viewers who suggested this showdown. I was surprised by the results myself!

Read more...
50mm Shoot Out!  Image Quality - Part 2 - 2019

50mm Shoot Out! Image Quality - Part 2 - 2019

Friday, 19 April 2019 15:20

Check out the full comparison

Read more...
50mm Shoot Out! Part 1 - Intro, Specs and Build quality (2019)

50mm Shoot Out! Part 1 - Intro, Specs and Build quality (2019)

Wednesday, 17 April 2019 22:43

 

Here are all the handling and focus rankings.

Read more...
Best Wireless Charger - What to Buy?

Best Wireless Charger - What to Buy?

Sunday, 31 March 2019 02:40

 

Apples product is dead in the water - and the alternatives vary WILDLY in price. In this video I compare 10 options and tell you about build, compatibility and usability.

Read more...
Mirrorless VS Water - Round 2 (Water festival)

Mirrorless VS Water - Round 2 (Water festival)

Tuesday, 26 March 2019 16:59

This time, the cameras will survive... I hope!

Read more...
Best Drone Filters - Mavic 2 Pro

Best Drone Filters - Mavic 2 Pro

Wednesday, 20 March 2019 21:03

In this video I compare 5 sets of filters for the Mavic 2 Pro drone, including DJIs own, PolarPro, Tiffen, Polares, & F Stop - testing both still and video results.

Read more...
Sony a6400 Review - UPDATED (please read caption)

Sony a6400 Review - UPDATED (please read caption)

Friday, 01 February 2019 07:17

UPDATE 9 March 2019.

Read more...
Will a NEW CAMERA improve your Photography?? ?

Will a NEW CAMERA improve your Photography?? ?

Tuesday, 12 March 2019 13:35

We've all heard (& probably said) "The best camera is the one you have with you..." But is it accurate? Is it helpful? Or is it an over simplification that is actually not true at all??

Read more...
Leica Q2 Review (vs Q1 type 116)

Leica Q2 Review (vs Q1 type 116)

Thursday, 07 March 2019 13:30

It's been almost 4 years since the original Leica Q was announced, and there have been some big upgrades. 

Read more...