QNAP TVS-871T - Faster than SSD!

Featured Tuesday, 01 September 2015 11:17

Filled with NAS HDD's, this thing flies - fastest realistic storage option I EVER tested!

 Check it out at: http://bit.ly/TVS-871T

Seagate NAS drives: http://bit.ly/Seagate_NAS

Get Your Gear Out!
Intimate Portraiture series: http://mattgranger.com/intimate
Private Bodies book: http://mattgranger.com/privatebodies
Workshops: http://mattgranger.com/workshops
Merch: http://mattgranger.com/merch
Mailing List: http://www.mattgranger.com
Ethics and Conduct statement: http://mattgranger.com/ethics

Subscribe HERE: http://bit.ly/Sub_MG
Subscribe for News: http://bit.ly/Subscribe_MG_News
Google Plus: http://bit.ly/MG_Gplus
Community Forum: http://www.mattgranger.com/community/
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/mattgranger
Twitter: https://twitter.com/_mattgranger
Instagram: http://instagram.com/_mattgranger
Official Website: http://www.mattgranger.com
Second Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/PhotoNewsReviews

Please check out my art nude photography book - Private Bodies: http://bit.ly/PrivBodies
___
SUPPORT Matt - Please buy your gear using these links:
Adorama: http://bit.ly/Adorama_USA
B&H Photo: http://bit.ly/bhphotoUSA
Amazon USA: http://bit.ly/Amazon_usa
Amazon UK: http://bit.ly/ukAmazon
Amazon Germany: http://bit.ly/DeAmazon
Australia: http://mattgranger.com/my-gear
___

Get Your Gear Out!

Workshops: http://mattgranger.com/workshops
Merch: http://mattgranger.com/merch
Mailing List: http://www.mattgranger.com

Share:

8 comments

  • Comment Link Remco Tuesday, 01 September 2015 16:21 posted by Remco

    I think your benchmarktool is benching from the 64MB cache from the HDD's, not the true HDD disk speeds for large files.

    Report
  • Comment Link DL Tuesday, 01 September 2015 21:34 posted by DL

    Blackmagic's disk speed test offers a minimum file size of 1GB and goes all the way up to 5GB, so those files are definitely leaving the cache and being written to disk.

    The whole point of this tool is to check if your storage is fast enough to edit HD and Ultra HD footage from Blackmagic's Cinema cameras which themselves use off the shelf SSDs for internal storage because SD and CF cards simply aren't fast enough. Only measuring the transfer rate to the hard drive's cache would entirely defeat the purpose of this benchmarking software.

    Report
  • Comment Link Gary Wednesday, 02 September 2015 00:29 posted by Gary

    You both have valid points. Blackmagic's speed test will not be accurate until you saturate the cache on the NAS appliance.
    The NAS have 16G of ram so you will need to copy over several large files around 16G each. I would use a different computer attached to the USB3 interface. Then run the test on the thunder bolt interface with black magic while the files are being copying from USB3.

    This will give you an idea what transfer rate and bandwidth you can expect during disk high utilization.

    Some NAS have a option to disable the cache.

    Report
  • Comment Link Tor Thursday, 03 September 2015 18:08 posted by Tor

    A speed of close to 1000Mb/s is amazing, but with 8 disk, not unrealistic.
    With a total price tag close to Canon EOS 5D Mark III or a Nikon D750 body, it is out of my reach :(
    With 8 disks, one disk will break 8 times more than a single disk. Even with RAID6, this system is not foolproof, so keep a backup on a seperate system.

    Report
  • Comment Link Edward Saturday, 05 September 2015 10:40 posted by Edward

    does this i5 or i7 make any difference? http://www.span.com/product/Qnap-Desktop-NAS-10GbE-TB2-TVS-871T-i7-16G-8-Bay-JBOD-RAID-0-1-5-6-16GB-RAM-Core-i7-10GbE-Thunderbolt-2~51031

    Report
  • Comment Link DoneIT Monday, 07 September 2015 02:53 posted by DoneIT

    Welcome to 2010... People have been swapping to QNAP for years. Drobo is only "known" in the photography industry, outside of it no one touches them. It's only because the Kelby-clique promoted Drobo and majority of photogs have no clue about this topic

    Report
  • Comment Link Prime IS where its at Monday, 07 September 2015 02:58 posted by Prime IS where its at

    I truly do not understand why people are wasting money on such things. Buy a PC for starters, it'll give you a better screen and much more power than any Apple product you own.
    Next stick as many harddrives inside that PC as you like, it'll be MUCH FASTER than any NAS you use.

    Now you're going to say "but my NAS is a back solution" well, that's what Amazon prime is for. Your NAS setup = over $1000. My prime will take over 10 years to cost me that and I have all my photos uploaded there.

    Report
  • Comment Link Chris Sunday, 14 February 2016 05:43 posted by Chris

    The video is misleading. Matt shows us four 4TB seagate drives he's going to install. He doesn't show us any additional. When we see the front of his NAS, we see all 8 LED's flashing, indicating there are 8 devices in the drive bays. He mentions nothing of an SSD cache, but with the speeds he's claiming to get, I suspect he does have 4 SSD drives installed to achieve that. Why do I believe this?

    I have this NAS connected via thunderbolt (2) as well. I have 1TB SSD cache in bays 1 & 2, and six 4TB drives in the remaining bays set up in raid 6 (as Matt claims his is) and the best speeds I've been able to get with black magic benchmark is 324 MB/s write and OCCASIONALLY 900+ MB/s on the read, but typically in the mid 700's for read. I've varied every possible configuration to try to get higher numbers, but failed. Even raid 10 isn't getting me an improvement. Now for a more practical test, when transferring large files to the NAS, I'm averaging 85 MB/s according to the NAS's own thunderbolt bandwidth graph.

    To be honest, it's a nice NAS with nice features and the thunderbolt card is a plus, but I'm not overly impressed with the performance given the price tag. There are other products out there that can out perform this one in regards to thunderbolt.

    (Matt, please fill us in on the full setup including your black magic setting, and whether or not you're using SSD cache and those settings, otherwise your benchmark screenshot is not of much use. I'd love to know if I'm doing something wrong, but I'm not getting anywhere near the numbers you are)

    Report

Leave a comment

Dear Nikon...

Dear Nikon...

Monday, 08 May 2017 15:49

What would YOU like to see from Nikon?

Read more...
Sony A9 - Is it a true Pro Option??

Sony A9 - Is it a true Pro Option??

Wednesday, 26 April 2017 04:51

CRAZY specs, dual cards, bigger batteries - is this everything Sony users have been asking for?

Read more...
Fuji GFX new lenses and roadmap

Fuji GFX new lenses and roadmap

Wednesday, 19 April 2017 08:35

GREAT to see Fujifilm being open with customers about the roadmap.

Read more...
8K - The Future of Video Resolution

8K - The Future of Video Resolution

Tuesday, 18 April 2017 08:28

8K video is 4 times higher resolution than 4K and 16 times the size of 1080!

Read more...
Nikon D7500 Preview (Vs D7200 & D500)

Nikon D7500 Preview (Vs D7200 & D500)

Wednesday, 12 April 2017 19:52

WHO IS THIS CAMERA AIMED AT? Maybe VLOGGERS? Hikers wanting the lightest camera possible?

Read more...
Hand Painted Photography Backdrops

Hand Painted Photography Backdrops

Tuesday, 28 March 2017 20:52

I just set up 3 unique hand painted backdrops from Gravity backdrops in Europe

Read more...
Lowepro SlingShot 302 - hands on review

Lowepro SlingShot 302 - hands on review

Thursday, 26 March 2015 20:31

My first ever video...

Read more...
Stylish Camera Messenger Bag - Buying Guide

Stylish Camera Messenger Bag - Buying Guide

Thursday, 23 March 2017 03:55

Blackforest vs Artisan & Artist vs Lowepro... what should you be looking for?

Read more...
Eliminating REVERB & ECHO (Echo... echo)

Eliminating REVERB & ECHO (Echo... echo)

Friday, 24 March 2017 03:45

Echo and Reverb are a BIG PAIN for filming. Today we overhaul the studio with some pretty cool acoustic panels to up our video and audio game!

Read more...